cross examination questions

3 similar searches for cross examination questions
  • Receive alerts:
  • by e-mail
    Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L.
  • via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for cross examination questions
  • By Phyllis Swebilius pswebilius@nhregister.com / @pswebilius on Twitter MILFORD -- Cross-examination questions Friday were rapid fire against prosecution witness Eusebio Melendez-Ventura in the murder trial of Javier Cruz-Falcon.

  • Invoices for the sale and delivery of asbestos-containing insulation to decedent’s work site were properly authenticated. Video deposition of decedent in prior asbestos product liability suit was admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 804(B)(1) because defendants in that matter possessed the same motive as appellee to develop testimony through direct and cross examination. Questions of fact precluded summary judgment.

  • Andrew Thomas' attorney hammered Maricopa County Supervisor Don Stapley in cross examination today about the finer details of his battles with the former County Attorney. And Stapley, who earlier in his had been self-assured and outraged when questioned by a State Bar attorney, repeatedly told defense attorney Brian Holohan on cross examination he didn't understand his questions.

  • Defense counsel elicited testimony regarding appellant's drug addiction which opened the door to questions on cross-examination by the state. No abuse of discretion by the trial court.

  • ROCKVILLE, Md. In an often testy four-hour cross-examination, John Allen Muhammad questioned the mental health and memory of his one-time sniper protg Lee Boyd Malvo and repeatedly referred to him as "son. I would prefer you address me by my name," Malvo shot back at one point, drawing an apology from the defendant.

  • SUFFICIENCY; MANIFEST WEIGHT; FAIR TRIAL; PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT; COMMENTS ON DEFENDANT’S FAILURE TO TESTIFY; IMPROPER QUESTIONS ON CROSS-EXAMINATION

  • BOSTON - It is clear that Daniel Petrocelli, the highly skilled lawyer for Jeffrey Skilling, one of the Enron defendants, thoroughly prepared his client before he took the stand to testify in his own defense. Undoubtedly, he showed Skilling copies of documents, investigative reports, prior statements, and other witnesses' statements and testimony, and advised him about choice of language he might use when answering questions on direct or cross- examination.

  • Evid.R. 607, Evid R. 611, Evid R. 613, adverse witness, hostile witness, cross-examination, leading questions, impeachment, written statements, Crim.R. 33, ineffective assistance of counsel, motion for new trial, Ohio Jury Instructions, deadly force, self-defense, new evidence.

  • DES MOINES, Iowa -- A district court judge in Iowa has ordered Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates and CEO Steve Ballmer to testify in person at a trial that starts in Iowa later this month. The two executives already were on the witness list to appear at the trial, but the ruling means they'll likely travel to Iowa earlier in the trial to face direct questioning by the plaintiffs' attorney. Without the ruling, they may have appeared later to answer cross-examination questions by the plaintiffs.

  • SEX OFFENSES – EVIDENCE/WITNESS/TRIAL – INDICTMENT/COMPLAINT – SENTENCING: The state presented sufficient evidence to support defendant’s convictions for three counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor: the state did not try defendant in an “all or nothing fashion” where it had sufficiently distinguished each charge in its indictment, the bill of particulars, and in its evidence presented at trial so as to afford defendant the opportunity to separately defend against each charge and so as to afford the jury the ability to consider each charge on its own. The state failed to present sufficient evidence to support one of four charges of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor in violation of R.C. 2907.04(A) where there was no evidence that defendant and the alleged victim had engaged...

    ... OF APPEALS    {¶17}  During the cross-examination of the state’s witnesses, the ... questions concerning the dates at issue, pointing out that Webster could not  remember ...

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2014, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company