criminal evidence

2 similar searches for criminal evidence

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

1 headnote for criminal evidence

- Criminal evidence

More than 10.000 documents for criminal evidence

- The devastating impact of prior crimes evidence and other myths of the criminal justice process.
We concur in the general opinion of courts, textwriters and the profession that much of this law [concerning exclusion of evidence of prior crimes] is...
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
- Vol. 101 Nbr. 2, March 2011
- Guns, fruits, drugs, and documents: a criminal defense lawyer's responsibility for real evidence.
INTRODUCTION A. The White House Tapes and the Church Laptop B. Lawyers on the Spot: How the Dilemmas May Arise C. Prior Scholarship I. THE THREE PREMI...
- Stanford Law Review
- Vol. 63 Nbr. 4, April 2011
- 8 CFR 1003.41 - Evidence of criminal conviction.
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 8: Aliens and Nationality

- Through a scanner darkly: functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states.
As with phrenology and the polygraph, society is again confronted with a device that the media claims is capable of reading our minds. Functional magn...
- Stanford Law Review
- Vol. 62 Nbr. 4, April 2010
- Walter Reddy: patriot's legally owned guns seized: a judge took away conservative activist Walter Reddy's guns, though Reddy has no criminal record and there is no evidence that he ever threatened anyone.
Walter Reddy is the patriotic organizer of the Committees of Safety, arguably a founding father of the modern Tea Party movement, and his right to kee...
- The New American
- May 23, 2011
- Evidence in International Criminal Trials: Lessons and Contributions From the Special Court for Sierra Leone
This article aims to contribute to the discourse on the development of a system of international criminal justice. The paper discusses the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), in particular, certain of its rules of evidence and their role in ensuring just, fair and expeditious trials for breaches of international humanitarian and international human rights law during the Sierra Leone conflict which lasted between 1991 and 2002. In the conclusion, the author considers whether the manner in which the SCSL interpreted and applied specific rules of evidence helped it to meet and contribute to the objectives of a system of international criminal justice. These objectives include holding violators of international norms accountable; guaranteeing procedural proprietary; giving legitimacy to ...
- 18 USC 3506 - Sec. 3506. Service of papers filed in opposition to official request by United States to foreign government for criminal evidence
- U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure
- Forensics Program Focuses On Digital Devices: ; Officials Say More Criminal Evidence Being Found On Computers, Cellular Phones
HUNTINGTON - Digital devices are making life easier for most people - including criminals. But the Marshall University Forensic Science Center is trying to stay a step ahead of them.
- Charleston Daily Mail
- January 11, 2012
- Supreme decisions: criminal evidence, voting rights, and presidential authority: three critical issues on the Supreme Court's docket this term.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] CASE 1 CRIMINAL EVIDENCE EVIDENCE FOUND as a result of police error, such as an unjustified search during a traffic stop,...
- New York Times Upfront
- Vol. 141 Nbr. 12, April 2009
- Foreword: bright lines and hard edges: anatomy of a criminal evidence decision.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Tome v. United States ruled that prior consistent statements of a witness are admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B), only if made before an alleged 'motive to fabricate' occurred. The decision is a narrow one, but it indicates a troubling desire to gain certainty by establishing bright-line exclusionary rules, instead of relying on general rules applied to the specific facts of each case. Furthermore, neither the majority nor the dissent used the best arguments available to them, although the dissent's argument was basically correct. Admissibility should be based on the evidence's rehabilitative significance.
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
- Vol. 85 Nbr. 4, March 1995