court order interest act

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for court order interest act

- 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review
In this document, section 202(h) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 requires the Commission to review its broadcast ownership rules quadrennially to determine whether these rules are necessary in the public interest as a result of competition. This document solicits comment on proposed changes to the broadcast ownership rules in compliance with this requirement. In addition, this document solicits comment on certain aspects of the Commission's 2008 Diversity Order that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanded and directed the Commission to address in this proceeding. This document solicits comment also on potential changes to the Commission's broadcast attribution rules.
- Federal Register Nbr. 77 FR 2868, January 19, 2012
- Proposed rules
- Federal Communications Commission
- From Georgia V. Tennessee Copper Co. To Massachusetts V. Epa: An Overview of America's History of Air Pollution Regulation and Its Effect On Future Remedies to Climate Change
THE CLEAN AIR ACT'S PREEMPTIVE EFFECT ON THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW OF NUISANCE Until the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA ("Massachusetts II"),2 legal scholars disagreed as to the CAA's preemptive effect on interstate nuisance actions involving greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide.3 This debate was important to public interest groups and private citizens wanting to bring an interstate nuisance action under the federal common law.4 If the CAA preempted the federal common law for interstate nuisance actions involving greenhouses gases, then their cases would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. "11 In the early twentieth century, these specialized areas of federal common law became extremely important in interstate pollution disputes in order to protect the natural res...
- University of Memphis Law Review, The
- Vol. 38 Nbr. 3, April 2008
- The Latest Chapter In Litigation Finance - Back From The Brink?
...The interest rate was 3.5% compounded monthly (an effective ann..., but the Judge did note, obiter, that Courts have taken into account excessive fees as one of t... finding to current BC case law on the Court Order Interest Act (see Moore v Dhillon 1992 CarswellBC ...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2011, January 2011

- Gati v. Americredit Fin., (Ohio 2012)
Replevin; repossession; R.C. 4505.13/security interest in a motor vehicle/rights of secured party; temporary restraining order; injunctive relief; Consumer Sales Practices Act; statute of limitation
- Ohio Supreme Court
- General Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 563 U.S. (2011)
... Court from a three-judge District Court order directing California to remedy two ongoing v... be alteredto ensure that the rights and interests of the parties aregiven all due and necessary prot...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Commercial Dispute Resolution Briefing, July 2011.
Arbitration . Paris Court of Appeal rules in favour of enforcing Paris ICC a... disciplinary proceedings or wasted costs orders already provides a disincentive to experts to test... and target companies' earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. The transacti...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2011, January 2011
- From colorblindness to antibalkanization: an emerging ground of decision in race equality cases.
... have to perform some impossible feat in order to catch up with his fellow runner. . --Dr. Martin...-century after King spoke, in the Supreme Court's recent decisions addressing race-conscious effor...(68) In the interests of avoiding conflict and estrangement, the antibal...
- Yale Law Journal
- Vol. 120 Nbr. 6, April 2011
- Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. (2011)
... Court from a three-judge District Court order directing California to remedy two ongoing v... be alteredto ensure that the rights and interests of the parties aregiven all due and necessary prot...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Steve Armbruster v. John Cavanaugh, (3rd Cir. 2011)
... UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE THIRD C... that the crowd was disorderly and ordered Armbruster to Apush@ the Repent America demonstrat... cause of action based on a fresh liberty interest under the rubric of substantive due process.@ Id. ...
- Federal Circuits
- Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. (2011)
... 5, 1999, the Bankruptcy Court issuedan order granting Vickie summary judgment on Pierce'sclaim ... estate, and estimation of claims or interestsfor the purposes of confirming a plan under chapter 11...
- U.S. Supreme Court