court of claims of ohio

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for court of claims of ohio

- State ex rel. Cordray v. Court of Claims of Ohio, (Ohio 2010)
The Ohio Court of Claims lacks jurisdiction to consider and determine appeals from the Attorney General's decisions on attorney fee applications in crime victim reparation cases under R.C. 2743.51 et seq.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State ex rel. DeWine v. Court of Claims of Ohio (Slip Opinion), Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-5283
The Court of Claims lacks jurisdiction to review decisions of the attorney general granting or denying payment of attorney fees in connection with an award of reparations filed on behalf of a victim of a crime.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims of Ohio, (Ohio 2010)
Writ of mandamus denied where relator already received requested relief.
- Ohio Supreme Court

- State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of Claims of Ohio, Victim of Crime Div., 98 Ohio St.3d 399 (2003)
Court of Claims — Reparation awards to victims of crimes — Mandamus sought to compel respondents Court of Claims of Ohio, Victims of Crime Division et al., to vacate the Court of Claims orders denying benefits to relator and to pay him benefits — Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaint affirmed.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Wallace v. Grafton Corr. Inst., (Ohio 2011)
Court of Claims of Ohio properly adopted magistrate's decision finding in favor of defendant on plaintiff's negligence claim.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of Claims of Ohio et al., (Ohio 2002)
C. 2743.51;Court of Claims;Victims of Crime;Hearsay;Reparations.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State ex rel. Tenace v. Court of Claims of Ohio, 94 Ohio St.3d 319 (2002)
Mandamus and procedendo sought to compel Court of Claims to rule on merits of relator’s motion for court review of the administrative determination of his claim to recover replacement value of missing property and to compel the Mansfield Correctional Institution to permit him to replace personal property that the prison either lost or destroyed — Court of appeals’ denial of writs affirmed.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Fritch v. The Univ. of Toledo College of Medicine, (Ohio 2011)
The Court of Claims of Ohio did not abuse its discretion when it permitted and relied on expert testimony regarding potential causes of the plaintiff-appellants injuries, other than surgeon negligence, in the plaintiff-appellants medical negligence action. Even though the defense experts did not state a cause to any degree of reasonable medical probability, the testimony was admissible to contradict expert testimony by the plaintiff-appellants expert that surgeon negligence was the probable cause of her injuries.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Cole v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., (Ohio 2011)
Judgment of Court of Claims of Ohio dismissing appellant's complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) affirmed.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Moore v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., (Ohio 2011)
The plaintiff filed suit against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections in the Court of Claims of Ohio alleging age and race discrimination pursuant to R.C. Chapter 4112, the Age Discrimination Employment Act of 1967, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Because the claims were barred by their applicable statutes of limitations, the trial court did not err in granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant.
- Ohio Supreme Court