continuance in court

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for continuance in court

- State v. Meyer, (Ohio 2011)
SPEEDY TRIAL: The trial court erred by denying the defendants motion to dismiss the charges against him when the state failed to bring him to trial within the applicable 30-day statutory period: although R.C. 2945.72(H) provides that the speedy-trial time may be extended when the state requests a reasonable continuance, the magistrate in the mayors court did not state the reason for the continuance in the courts journal; because of this failure, there was no basis for determining whether the continuance was reasonable, and, therefore, the time attributable to the continuance was chargeable to the state.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- In re R.C., (Ohio 2010)
Case plan was properly designed to promote reunification. Trial court did not err in delaying the grant of continuance until some witnesses were complete. Trial court did not err in finding that termination of parental rights is in the best interest of the children.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- OPTi Inc Announces That the Court Issued a Continuance in Patent Infringement Action Against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
PALO ALTO, Calif. -- OPTi Inc (OTCBB:OPTI) today announced that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas entered an order to...
- Business Wire
- January 13, 2009

- Beal Bank S.S.B. v. Means, (Ohio 2011)
The trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants motion for a continuance pursuant to Civ.R. 56(F) where the court stayed discovery for several months and counsel presented an affidavit that outlined family health issues that caused him to need additional time.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Court's failure to grant continuance plain error: the high court rules that a judge's failure to grant defense counsel's request for a continuance in a murder trial was plain error requiring a new trial.
A trial judge's failure to grant defense counsel's request for a continuance of a double murder trial, accompanied by disparaging remarks and an openl...
- Illinois Bar Journal
- Vol. 97 Nbr. 3, March 2009
- Jacobs v. Jones, (Ohio 2011)
The trial court erred in refusing defendant's request for a continuance on the morning of trial where (1) defendant demonstrated he suffered an accident that led to his hospital admission, surgery, and CT scan and possible stroke, (2) defendant was representing himself, and (3) the magistrate described defendant as incoherent when he called and requested a continuance on the day of trial.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Continuance Granted in Fraud Case
An East Haven woman accused of insurance fraud and other counts in connection with a fire at a home she owned in Clinton will be in court again on Dec. 9. Kathleen L. Ruggiero, 54, 349 Laurel St., East Haven, was granted a continuance Monday in court.
- New Haven Register
- November 23, 2011
- Ex-Mainer's Sentencing Postponed a 3rd Time
MOUNT DESERT - The sentencing of a former seasonal resident who pleaded guilty last July to stealing more than $27 million from investors has been postponed until April, according to documents filed in federal court in Philadelphia. Donald Anthony Walker Young, 40, embezzled the money from investors from the firm he founded and ran in Kennett Square, Pa., from 1999 to 2009, federal officials have said. He had been scheduled to be sentenced Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia but requested and was granted a 30-day continuance, according to information posted on the federal court's website.
- Bangor Daily News
- March 25, 2011
- State v. Shepherd, (Ohio 2006)
CRIMINAL LAW/EVIDENCE – manifest weight; attempted murder; kicks to head; felonious assault; punching prison guard. CRIMINAL LAW/SPEEDY TRIAL – R.C. 2941.401; 180 days; continuance in open court; continuance for trial preparation.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Austintown Ambulatory Emergency Room v. Mansour, (Ohio 2011)
Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for a continuance of the trial that was faxed but not filed and is not currently part of the record; Damage award was supported by the evidence at trial and liability issues cannot be reviewed as a stipulation had been entered.
- Ohio Supreme Court