© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
- Language
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
constitutional court judgments
More than 10.000 documents for constitutional court judgments
-
....This case arises from serious constitutional violations inCalifornia's prison system. The viola... situatedto make the difficult factual judgments necessary to fashion a remedy for this complex and...
-
Levinson takes up the fervid debate of whether or not the US Supreme Court should commit itself to comparative constitutional law, namely in discussing and citing judgments of foreign courts. Fueled by Justice Scalia's dissent in the Lawrence v Texas judgment of June 2003, Levinson makes no secret of his view that he is "no fan of Justice Scalia" and finds "his militant provincialism embarrassing." However, Levinson subscribes to Scalia's view that the practices of foreign nations will not be of help for American judges, since their nations of justice are different.
-
....This case arises from serious constitutional violations inCalifornia's prison system. The viola... situatedto make the difficult factual judgments necessary to fashion a remedy for this complex and...
-
... too far to extend the jurisdiction of the Court generally to cases arising under the Constitution,...Constitutional restrictions are intertwined with prudential consi... of Constitutional Courts to render no judgments not binding and conclusive on the parties and none...
-
... comply with Texas law and were constitutionally inadequate in light of the procedural requirements...and lend[ing] finality to state court judgments within a reasonable time," Day v. McDonough , 5...
-
...Notwithstanding the myriad constitutional and evidentiary principles designed to minimize th... abstract, normative, or moral value judgments; it also necessarily implicates core constitutiona...
-
... requires federal courts to reopen final judgments entered before its enactment. Pp. 215-240. (a) Des... were not understood to be constitutionally proscribed by the Constitution's separation of pow...
-
In the Medellin v. Dretke case, the US Supreme Court squarely considered the domestic judicial enforceability of a judgment by the International Court of Justice for the first time. Although the Court ultimately dismissed the case due to George W. Bush's intervention, the issue that won the Court's attention - the domestic legal status of international tribunal judgments - will almost certain return to the Court in the near future. When it does, the Court will be faced with calls from leading scholars to enforce the judgments of international courts and tribunals as part of a new world court order, characterized by cooperation between international and domestic courts. The first comprehensive constitutional critique of judicial enforcement of international tribunal judgments is laid out...
-
Criminal law R.C. Chapter 2950 Sex offenders R.C. 2950.031 and 2950.032 violate separation of powers by requiring executive branch to reclassify sex offenders already classified by court order Only appellate courts are constitutionally permitted to review or modify court judgments Executive branch may not reopen final judgments Stare decisis Doctrine not controlling in cases presenting constitutional question R.C. 2950.031 and 2950.032 severed.
-
... stop third parties from pursuing constitutional challenges to state tax benefits in a federal foru... Court reviewing lower federal-court judgments--have reached the merits of third-party constituti...
