Conflict of jurisdiction

• 16 USC 825 - Sec. 825q. Conflict of jurisdiction

• U.S. Code - Title 16: Conservation

• Entrenched Hegemony, Efficient Procedure, or Selective Justice?: An Inquiry into Charges for Gender-Based Violence at the International Criminal Court

Introduction: The Woman's Face Of Africa's First World War. II. Foundation For Analysis: Feminist Jurisprudential Challenges To International Law. A. International Human Rights Law . B. International Humanitarian Law . III. (R)Evolution: Lessons Learned From The Ad Hoc Tribunals. IV. A Prima Facie Case: Crimes Against Humanity And War Crimes Against Women In The DRC Conflict. A. Exercise of Jurisdiction. B. Elements of the Crimes. 1. Crimes Against Humanity. 2. War Crimes. V. Efficiency Over Justice?: The Fate Of Charges For Gendered Violence In Prosecutor v. Lubanga. A. Women's Initiatives's Request to Participate as Amicus Curiae. B. The Prosecutor's Strategy and Proprio Motu Power. C. The Checks and Balances of the Rome Statute. VI. The Gendered Consequences Of Selective Justice. ...

• Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems
• Nbr. 17-1, October 2007

• A Way Forward with the International Criminal Court

Created by a treaty, the Rome Statute, opened for signature in 1998 and commencing operation after ratification by 60 state signatories in July 2002, the Court has as the subject matter of its jurisdiction the most horrible acts of violence that political conflict can produce: genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity. Rather than vesting the prosecutor with this proprio motu power, the United States wanted the Court to take up investigations on the basis of referrals from the United Nations Security Council and not otherwise (except for self-referrals, whereby a state party would ask the ice to investigate conduct that took place on its own territory, presumably owing to a lack of confidence in its ability to prosecute such cases effectively).

• Policy Review
• Nbr. 159, February 2010

• Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Maple Leaf Expansion, Inc., (Ohio 2010)

Pennsylvania court had subject matter jurisdiction to provide a ruling on a confession of judgment. Choice of law, conflict of laws, and the specific facts or a case are considered after, and do not affect, the threshold issue of subject matter jurisdiction.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• 12 CFR 1511.3 - Law governing other interests.

... in this part, the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of a Securities Intermediary's juris... a ?Securities Intermediary's jurisdiction? for purposes of this section:. (1) If an agreemen...

• Code of Federal Regulations - Title 12: Banks and Banking

• Cheselka v. Court of Common Pleas of Lake Cty., (Ohio 2007)

EXTRAORDINARY WRIT - prohibition; jurisdiction of common pleas court; indirect criminal contempt; dismissal of underlying action; attorney's failure to inform trial judge of possible trial conflict; any lack of jurisdiction not patent and unambiguous; adequate legal remedy through appeal.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• 'Mayor Will Have Jury of His Peers'

KW: Maybe that's how they do things in Chicago but that's not done here. I understand that's how they sometimes do things in the federal system. I think what he's talking about is that he wants to meet with me personally prior to our investigation being concluded. And I still think that's the wrong thing to do. I've never done it for any of the defendants since I've been here since 2004. I'm not going to start now. I think when you do an investigation it has to be impartial and fair and, frankly, I don't need the intercession of the defendant's lawyer to try to make our decision. I just think this is the fairest way to proceed as possible. If you do it the other way I think it just looks bad. And I think it has the taint of not being fair as well. KW: You know, I really didn't think abo...

... that much because it happened in my jurisdiction. There wasn't a reason why I shouldn't look at it.. There was no conflict of interest. No legal reason why I shouldn't inves...

• Michigan Chronicle
• August 26, 2009

• What is custody?

Custody is the legal authority to control a child. The power to make important decisions about a child is generally referred to as "legal" custody. The power to maintain physical, day-to-day control over a child is generally referred to as "physical" custody. The custodial parent is the parent with physical custody of a child. The other parent is the non-custodial parent. Both parts of custody - legal and physical - can be sole or joint. Each state has a statutory standard to be used by the courts in deciding custody disputes. All 50 states have enacted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act which is intended to avoid conflict between courts of different states in cases where parents have moved children from one state to another. In such cases, the Uniform Act provides that the pr...

• Domestic & Family
• Questions & Answers

• Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., ___ Ohio St.3d ___ (2006)

An actual conflict between Ohio law and the law of another jurisdiction must exist before a choice-of-law analysis is undertaken — The doctrine of collateral estoppel cannot be invoked when there is no final order.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• In re D.H., (Ohio 2007)

JURISDICTION; CHILD CUSTODY; JURISDICTIONAL CONFLICT; INCONVENIENT FORUM; MOTION TO TERMINATE JURISDICTION; LOCAL RULE; MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE; GUARDIAN AD LITEM; BEST INTERESTS.

• Ohio Supreme Court