-
Trial court’s denial of motion to suppress was supported by competent, credible evidence. Trial court’s denial of motion to reveal identity of confidential informant who was not vital to establishing the crime was not an abuse of discretion. Verdict was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
-
Criminal LawIdentity Theft Sufficiency Of EvidencePrior ActsWhere a district court admitted evidence of a defendant's prior identity theft convictions, the evidence was relevant to his knowledge and intent and was similar in kind and not overly remote in time to the aggravated identity charge at issue, so the court did not abuse its discretion, and the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction. Judgment is affirmed.U.S. v. Clark (MLW No. 63283/Case No. 11-2270 - 11 pages) (U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit, Wollman, J.) Appealed from U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Doty, J. (James Raymond Behrenbrinker, Minneapolis, argued for appellant) (Lola A Velazquez-Aguilu, Minneapolis, argued for appellee).
Criminal Law False LienSufficiency Of EvidenceSelf Representation (1...
-
...Although other evidence-based models (Gambrill, 2005; Gibbs, 2003; Shlonsk..., acculturation in the context of ethnic identity, conceptualization of illness, immigration history...Common elements of culturally competent interventions include allowing clients to determin...
-
... "falsely represented to an investor her identity, that she was an expert in international stock exc... extradition hearing to determine if the evidence is sufficient to sustain the charge of extradition... of the treaty; and (5) there was competent legal evidence to support a finding of extradi...
-
... have a tag, seal, or other means of identity that includes the date on which it was last tested... specified above, as long as there is evidence in the form of heat distribution data that they ac... with procedures recognized by a competent processing authority and records shall be kept on ...
-
Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence; state presented sufficient evidence to establish the identity of appellant as one of the perpetrators.
... that the state provided sufficient competent, credible evidence to establish the identity ...
-
... an employer needed a strong basis in evidence that the statute was violated before it could thro... a plus on the basis of racial identity as the schools treated applicants for admission in... that government employers are not competent to enforce disparate impact remedies because they ...
-
.... Contractors have a duty to hire competent subcontractors. . The Corporate Structure On The B...His evidence in this regard was not accepted. . The process of ... Downview being mistaken as to the identity of the subcontractor that the persons who were con...
-
...Page 185 U.S. 296, 300. prima facie evidence;' that, 'in the absence of such certificate, otherr competent evidence to show the identity of the person, and t...
-
... law enforcement agencies to discover the identity (if they do not already know it) of any law office... because the taxpayer was "no more competent to authenticate the accountant's workpapers or rep...