commerce clause interpretation

  • Receive alerts:
  • by e-mail
    Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L.
  • via RSS
More than 10.000 documents for commerce clause interpretation
  • Introduction I. An Overview Of Commerce Clause Jurisprudence A. The Limited Scope Of The Federal Commerce Power Before The New Deal B. The Expansive Scope Of The Commerce Power After The New Deal C. Lopez, Morrison, And Limits On The Commerce Power II. Survey Of Post-Lopez Commerce Clause Scholarship A. The Meaning Of The Text Of The Commerce Clause 1. General Explorations Of The Commerce Clause As An Enumerated Power 2. Exploring Original Sources For The Commerce Clause's Meaning a. A Functional Interpretation Of The Commerce Clause Based On The Sixth Virginia Resolution b. The Original Public Meaning Of The Commerce Clause: An In- Depth Debate i. Opening Shot: Nelson And Pushaw ii. Return Fire: Barnett 2001 iii. Counter-Attack: Nelson And Pushaw 2002 iv. Flanking Maneuver: Barnett 200...

  • Introduction. II. A Critique of Trademark Use on Descriptive Grounds. A. Interpretation of "Use in Commerce". B. Interpretation of the "In Connection With" Clause. C. Common Law Incorporation. D. Case Law Revisionism. III. A Prescriptive Critique of Trademark Use. A. Flaws in the Search Costs Justification For Trademark Use. 1. Do Non-Trademark Uses Cause Confusion?. 2. Search Engines and Search Costs: Information Overload. 3. Search Engines and Search Costs: Insufficient Regulation. 4. Prudential Concerns. 5. Incompleteness. B. False Determinacy. 1. The Development of Ancillary Use Doctrines. 2. Uncertainty in Actual Use Inquiries. 3. A Diagnosis: Use as Proxy. 4. Lessons for Trademark Use in the Infringement Context. C. Ignoring Complexities in the Concept of a Mark. D. The False A...

  • Opponents of the federal health care reform law want Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster to join other states in lawsuits challenging its constitutionality. House and Senate Republicans pushed through resolutions urging Koster to act. They say their admonitions are not political. Koster defers, saying the question involves a "fascinating" interpretation of the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution and should not be partisan.

  • ... to regulate activities in and affecting commerce. In reversing, the Court of Appeals held that, in ... beyond Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. Held: The Act exceeds Congress' Commerce Clause a... a coherent or consistent course of interpretation; for neither the course of technological advance n...

  • For many years, there has been a simmering quarrel in the legal literature over the scope of the term "commerce" in the Constitution's Commerce Clause. Before 1937, the Supreme Court's interpretation was that the Clause authorized Congress to regulate only buying and selling across state lines -- the sort of thing we might label economic exchange, economic intercourse, or mercantile trade. The word was bound tightly with the Lex Mercatoria and the sort of activities engaged in by merchants: buying and selling products made by others, associated finance and financial instruments, navigation and other carriage, and intercourse across jurisdictional lines. For reasons of policy and politics, the founding generation inserted this conceptual and legal boundary into the Constitution. The clea...

  • Clause 1. Power to Tax and Spend . Clause 1. The Congres... date Congress has acted upon the interpretation espoused by Hamilton. Appropriations for subsidies... banks, by reference to its powers over commerce, post roads, and fiscal operations, and to its war...

  • In addition to the questionable constitutionality of the bill, the unfunded mandates in the health care reform bill will cripple Georgia's economic recovery," said [Casey Cagle]. "Unlike Washington, our state constitution requires us to balance the budget each year." The constitutionality of health care reform revolves around the interpretation of the 10th Amendment and the Commerce Clause. The 10th Amendment reads, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. There's an interesting subtext to the Georgia lieutenant governor's argument. In the Democrats' blind zeal to pass their leftist policies, they are by default writing checks they know they can't cash. That massiv...

  • [Janice Rogers Brown] is not an umpire, either. She is a judge on the District of Columbia Circuit Court - and someone whom President Bush could have nominated in [John Roberts]' stead. Judge Brown would be far less likely than Roberts to use the umpire image. Temperamentally, she's more the revolutionary, or rather the counter-revolutionary, against what she has called "the revolution of 1937," the year of "the triumph of our own socialist revolution. The notion that we ever had a triumphant socialist revolution might appear bizarre to many observers. But Judge Brown is only one of the lawyers, economists, and right-wing think-tank policy mavens who contend that there is a "hidden Constitution" or "Constitution in exile" that was supplanted in 1937 when the Supreme Court upheld bo...

    ... an invalid reading of the constitutional clause giving Congress the power to "regulate commerce ..... The substantive result of a narrow interpretation of the Commerce Clause would be to weaken, if not ...

  • ... to enact § 13981 under either the Commerce Clause or § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which ... at length in Lopez, our interpretation of the Commerce Clause has changed as our Nation h...

  • INTRODUCTION I. PAST INTERPRETATIONS OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 A. Section 8 Outside the C...The General Welfare Clause 2. The Commerce Clause II. THEORY OF THE GENERAL W...



Loading

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company