collateral estoppel v. res judicata

• Favorable Termination After Freedom: Why Heck's Rule Should Reign, Within Reason

Introduction. II. Favorable Termination: An Overview Of History And Reach. A. Heck v. Humphrey. B. Spencer v. Kemna. C. The Circuit Split. 1. Circuits Endorsing the Heck Majority. 2. Circuits Endorsing the Spencer "Majority". III. The Availability Of § 1983 To Non-Habeas-Eligible Criminals. A. The History and Purpose of § 1983 Do Not Counsel Against Favorable Termination. 1. Concurrent Jurisdiction Over § 1983 Claims Illustrates State Court Adequacy. 2. Official Immunities in § 1983 Actions Illustrate State Court Adequacy. 3. The Aims of § 1983 Espoused by the Supreme Court. B. Strong State Sovereignty Interests Demand Respect for State Court Decisions. 1. Constitutional Federalism Acknowledges the Importance of State Sovereignty. 2. Rules and Doctrines Analogous to Favorable Termina...

... set of operative facts if such a collaterally-attacking § 1983 claim was cognizable. If the tru...185 . c. Full Faith and Credit: Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel. The preclusion doctrines ...

• Louisiana Law Review
• Nbr. 70-2, January 2010

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Dallas Abrams, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pacific Coast Defense Credit Union; North Island Federal Credit Union; Joseph Stratton, Defendants-Appellants., 66 F.3d 334 (9th Cir. 1995)

Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM* Appellants Pacific Coast D...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. John Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cutter Biological, Inc., a Division of Miles Laboratories, Inc.; Miles Laboratories; and Armour Pharmaceutical Corporation, Defendants-Appellees., 89 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 1996)

Before: PREGERSON and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge*. MEMORANDUM...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Gurchuran Singh Dulai Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Defendant-Appellee., 42 F.3d 1399 (9th Cir. 1994)

Before: GOODWIN, D.W. NELSON, and HALL, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM** This case hinges on the v...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Richard L. Gastineau, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Home Depot Usa, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Beth Burzloff, a Single Woman, Defendants-Appellees., 76 F.3d 386 (9th Cir. 1996)

Before: LAY,** CHOY, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Tyrone Goodwin, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent., 979 F.2d 854 (9th Cir. 1992)

Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE**, District Judge. Tyrone Good...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan Edward Woodbridge, Defendant-Appellant., 52 F.3d 336 (9th Cir. 1995)

Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM* Allan Edward Woodbridge appeals his...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence Daniel Davenport; Sherry Lynn Armstrong; and Lee Armstrong, Defendants-Appellants., 127 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir. 1997)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-95-60077-MRH; Michael R. Hogan, Chief District Judge, Presiding. Befo...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Bennett, Defendant-Appellant., 95 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 1996)

Before: REAVLEY,* REINHARDT, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM...

• Federal Circuits

• Notice: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 Provides that Dispositions Other Than Opinions or Orders Designated for Publication Are Not Precedential and Should Not Be Cited Except When Relevant Under the Doctrines of Law of the Case, Res Judicata, or Collateral Estoppel. Gary v. Jernigan, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Robert Borg; J. Valencia; D.J. Evans; E. Lewis; R. Harikian; R. Brown; J. Franz; G.W. Shepherd, Defendants-Appellees., 113 F.3d 1241 (9th Cir. 1997)

Before: HUG, Chief Judge; THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM** OVERVIEW Gary V...

• Federal Circuits