collateral attack on a judgment

  • Receive alerts:
  • by e-mail
    Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L.
  • via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for collateral attack on a judgment
  • Judicial acts committed in “excess of jurisdiction” are voidable; class action constituted impermissible collateral attack on municipal court judgments; judgment of conviction, including court costs, is a final appealable order; res judicata; subject matter jurisdiction.

  • Appellate review – App.R. 26(A) – Motion for reconsideration – Juvenile sex offender's motion for reconsideration is denied where the juvenile brought the appellate court's attention to a potential error in its prior decision, but the disposition of the appeal would not change. The error would still amount to an impermissible collateral attack on a voidable judgment, which the appellate court is not authorized to entertain.

  • Dismissal of the declaratory judgment action was proper because it constituted an impermissible collateral attack on an order issued by the trial court in a criminal case. Judgment affirmed.

  • ... forState post-conviction or other collateral review with respect to the pertinent judgment or c... of the related phrase "collateral attack"points in the same direction. A "collateral attack...

  • Infants; Juvenile sex offender classification; Juvenile sex offender registrant; Timing; R.C. 2152.83; Subject matter jurisdiction; Jurisdiction over the particular case; Lack of jurisdiction; Error in the exercise of jurisdiction; Collateral attack; Res judicata; Waiver – The juvenile court erred in classifying appellant as a Tier III juvenile sex offender 19 months before he was actually released a secure facility. Nonetheless, appellant's motion to vacate his classification amounted to an impermissible collateral attack on the voidable judgment.

  • ... asks us to vacate the district court's judgment, entered pursuant to a stipulation by the parties,... it would amount to "an impermissible collateral attack" on Thomasville's 1999 judgment "and/or is ...

  • Contempt; Suspension of Child Support Obligation; CSEA; Collateral attack on judgment; res judicata

  • Failure to raise issue under Blakely v. Washington (2004), 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403, at sentencing forfeits that issue, whether for purposes of direct appellate review or for purposes of a subsequent collateral attack on the judgment. State v. Payne, 114 Ohio St.3d 502, 2007-Ohio-4642 followed. Application of severance remedy provided for in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, does not violate ex post facto clause in United States Constitution. State v. Smith, 2006-Ohio-4405, Montgomery App. No. 21004, approved and followed. Order denying motion for appointment of counsel for re-sentencing Affirmed.

  • Where a parent enters an appearance in a foreign state and contests issues of subject-matter jurisdiction, child custody and child support on their merits, without challenging that state’s exercising of personal jurisdiction over him, and those issues are finally adjudicated in that state, he may not subsequently assert a collateral attack in this state, based upon a claimed lack of personal jurisdiction in the rendering state, when an attempt is made to register the foreign state’s judgment in this state for enforcement purposes. Foreign state’s judgment that it had subject-matter jurisdiction is not clearly erroneous. Trial court did not err in denying the parent’s motion to dismiss based upon the collateral attack on the foreign state’s judgment. Affirmed.

  • ...v. U. S.),2004 I. C. J. 12 (Judgment of Mar. 31), in which theInternational Court... that might someday authorize a collateral attack on that judgment. The United States does no...

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2013, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company