-
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DONGBU STEEL CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,
and
UNION STEEL MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellant...
-
TOKYO -- Please replace the release dated February 4, 2011 with the following corrected version due to multiple revisions.
The corrected release read...
-
In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to revise the existing Authorization Validated End-User (VEU) listings for five VEUs in the People's Republic of China (PRC) and one VEU in India. For Applied Materials (China), Inc. (AMAT), this rule amends the eligible items AMAT may receive under Authorization VEU. For Boeing Tianjin Composites Co., Ltd. (BTC), this rule amends the eligible items the company may receive under Authorization VEU and revises the address of the eligible destination (i.e., facility) to which items may be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) under Authorization VEU. For CSMC Technologies Corporation (CSMC), this rule revises the address of one eligible destination. For Lam Research Corpor...
-
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
One of the critical issues of any corporation is how it continues to grow and perform successfully. Among stakeholders i...
-
10-0910-cv
Scandinavian Reins. Co. Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
...
-
Slip Op. 12-
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
SHANTOU RED GARDEN FOODSTUFF
CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff,v.
UN...
-
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to continue the trial where the court docketed its journal entry setting the trial dates upon granting a previous motion to continue the trial schedule. The trial court did not err in its determination that the evidence failed to demonstrate lost profit damages on a breach of contract action with reasonable certainty. The trial court did not err in considering hearsay evidence of which the opposing party failed to object at trial and a witnesss self-serving statements are not per se incredible.
-
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
...
-
We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) BR700-715A1-30, BR700-715B1-30, and BR700-715C1-30 turbofan engines. This proposed AD was prompted by the discovery of a manufacturing defect on certain part number (P/N) and serial number (S/N) low-pressure (LP) compressor booster rotors. This proposed AD would require initial and repetitive fluorescent penetrant inspections of certain P/N and S/N LP compressor booster rotors and rework or replacement of them as terminating action to the repetitive inspections. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the LP compressor booster rotor, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the airplane.
-
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
THROUGH ITS GATE PHARMACEUTICALS DIVISION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,...