co-determination act

• Amendments to the Foreign Posting Employees Act (1999:678) and the Employment (Co-Determination in the Workplace) Act (1976:580).

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2010, January 2010

• 48 CFR 1433.203 - Applicability.

• Code of Federal Regulations - Title 48: Federal Acquisition Regulations System

• Artimplant Continues to Realign Its Organization to the Market - Annual Savings of Approximately SEK 5 Million.

• Business Wire
• August 23, 2010

• The introduction of whistleblower systems in the European Union.

... monitoring and questions of labor codetermination also remain subject to national laws and court rul...

• Defense Counsel Journal
• Vol. 77 Nbr. 3, July 2010

• Works Councils And Union Strike Action In Germany, France And The UK.

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2011, January 2011

• Monsanto Co.; Determination of Nonregulated Status for Soybean Genetically Engineered To Have a Modified Fatty Acid Profile and for Tolerance to the Herbicide Glyphosate

We are advising the public of our determination that a soybean line developed by the Monsanto Co., designated as event MON 87705, which has been genetically engineered to have a modified fatty acid profile and for tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate, is no longer considered a regulated article under our regulations governing the introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms. Our determination is based on our evaluation of data submitted by the Monsanto Company in its petition for a determination of nonregulated status, our analysis of available scientific data, and comments received from the public in response to our previous notice announcing the availability of the petition for nonregulated status and its associated environmental assessment and plant pest risk assessment....

• Federal Register Nbr. 76 FR 78232, December 16, 2011
• Notices
• Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

• Corporate Governance in the European Union: Firm Nationality and the 'German' Model

While there has been some convergence in corporate governance codes and securities regulations across the European Union (EU), the remaining areas of divergence are the most contentious as they reflect differences in fundamental societal norms and values. I propose that using the multinational corporation as the referent unit of analysis yields a means for making a qualitative distinction between the two regimes. I suggest that at least for firms with EU-wide scope, certain critical elements of the German model may be more appropriate, as the neoclassical justifications of the Anglo-American model are less reliable in such a setting.

• Multinational Business Review
• Vol. 17 Nbr. 4, January 2009

• Approaching Comparative Company Law

This article identifies several common errors that occur in comparative law analyses, offers guidelines to help avoid such errors, and provides a framework for studying the company laws of three major jurisdictions. Part I discusses some of the problems that can arise in comparative law and offers a few points of caution that can be useful for practical, theoretical and legislative comparative law. Part II examines well-known examples of comparative analysis gone astray in order to demonstrate the utility of heeding the outlined points of caution. Part III provides an example of using functional definitions to Jemarcate the topic "company law," offering an "effects" test to determine whether a given provision of law should be considered as functionally part of the rules that govern the ...

• Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
• Vol. 14 Nbr. 1, January 2008

• Austrian Mergers and Acquisitions Review.

• Mondaq Business Briefing
• Nbr. 2005, January 2005

• Acquisition Regulation Rewrite

• FR, April 15, 2010
• Rules
• Interior Department