Clearly Erroneous Review

• State v. Ford, (Ohio 2002)

Sexual predator – sexual classification hearing – clearly erroneous – standard of review.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Colon, (Ohio 2005)

C. 2950.09(B)(3)---R.C. 2950.091---child-victim predator---child-victim oriented offense---clear and convincing evidence---clearly erroneous standard of review---competent, credible evidence.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Telling Truths: How the REAL ID Act's Credibility Provisions Affect Women Asylum Seekers

When a persecuted woman flees her country, she rarely brings with her evidence of persecution for a future asylum hearing in a far-away land. Because of this unavailability of corroborating evidence, asylum law has historically given great weight to the applicant's testimony. If it is deemed credible, her testimony may be the only evidence necessary to meet her burden of proof. Thus, credibility is essential to a grant of asylum. The REAL ID Act of 2005 adds a new credibility provision to the asylum statute that instructs immigration judges and adjudicators to assess the demeanor and candor of the applicant and the consistency of her statements. This Note will argue that, while useful in some circumstances, these factors may inaccurately assess the credibility of a persecuted woman due ...

... sexual assault, are at risk of being erroneously deemed not credible. . . When a persecuted woman ... of the standard of review from de novo to clearly erroneous. Ultimately, this Note will argue that t...

• Iowa Law Review
• Nbr. 92-2, February 2007

• State v. Unrue, (Ohio 2002)

rape- R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) - burglary - R.C. 2911.12(A)(2) - corrupting another with drugs - R.C. 2925.02(A)(4)(a) - standard of review - R.C. 2950.01 et seq. - sexual predator - clearly erroneous - some competent, credible evidence - maximum sentence - R.C. 2929.14 - R.C. 2953.08 - minimum sentence

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes:

...Amending NYSE Rule 128 So That Clearly Erroneous Executions Involving. Securities Recentl... treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in the event of transactions that result in the is...

• FR, August 19, 2011
• Notices
• Securities and Exchange Commission

• Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. (2011)

... to the district court, for that court's review and issuance of final judgment. The Bankruptcy Co... offact "shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous"). C. Vickie and the dissent argue ...

• U.S. Supreme Court

• Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes:

...Rule Change Related to the CBSX Clearly Erroneous Policy Pilot Program. August 11, 2011. P... treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in the event of transactions that result in the is...

• FR, August 17, 2011
• Notices
• Securities and Exchange Commission

• Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes:

...Clearly Erroneous Rule in Light of Changes to the Single S... treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in the event of transactions that result in the is...

• FR, August 17, 2011
• Notices
• Securities and Exchange Commission

• Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes:

...Governing Clearly Erroneous Executions. August 11, 2011. Pursuant to... treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in the event of transactions that result in the is...

• FR, August 18, 2011
• Notices
• Securities and Exchange Commission

• Self-Regulatory Organizations; Proposed Rule Changes:

...Clearly Erroneous Rule in Light of Changes to the Single S... treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in the event of transactions that result in the is...

• FR, August 17, 2011
• Notices
• Securities and Exchange Commission