classification of matter

• State v. Culgan, (Ohio 2010)

subject matter jurisdiction – State v. Foster – sexual predator classification – ineffective assistance of counsel – unreasonable delay – Crim.R. 32(A) –

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Zimmermans Starting a Softball Dynasty

Tradition is a staple of the softball program at Lehi High. No matter which classification the school finds itself battling through, the softball diamond always seems to be a place the Pioneers can count on, a place where they win games and find themselves deep in state tournaments. But it isn't just the school that makes victories in softball a tradition out in the Lehi area, the Zimmerman family has been winning on the diamond for years and plans to keep right on winning for many more.

• Deseret News (Salt Lake City)
• May 08, 2008

• State v. Moore, (Ohio 2008)

App.R. 4(A), time for appeal, R.C. 2901.11, subject matter jurisdiction, R.C. 2950.01(E); sexual predator classification, standard of review on appeal

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Racial Adjudication

This article will attempt to identify a principled limit to colorblindness -- to chart a course between the Scylla of a jurisprudence where the Equal Protection Clause perpetuates racial supremacy, and the Charybdis of a racial politic where discrimination on the basis of race is not a matter of fundamental principle but only a matter of whose ox is gored. Part II of this article further elaborates on the dilemma at the heart of Justice Anthony Kennedy's hypothetical. Part III will describe "": the process of individual racial classification and definition of benefits and burdens on that basis, rather than mere "classification," that is central to the Supreme Court's race jurisprudence. Part IV will explain why the process of is so troubling. Part ...

• Brigham Young University Law Review
• Vol. 2007 Nbr. 5, September 2007

• In re Abney, (Ohio 2008)

SEX OFFENSES: The sexually-oriented-offender classification arises as a matter of law, and no hearing is required to determine whether a defendant is a sexually-oriented offender. Under former R.C. Chapter 2950, if a defendant had been convicted of a sexually-oriented offense as defined in former R.C. 2901(D) and was not a habitual sexual offender or a sexual predator, the sexually-oriented-offender classification attached by operation of law. Under former R.C. Chapter 2950, once a defendant had been convicted of a sexually-oriented offense, he was automatically classified as a sexually-oriented offender, and he was required to comply with the registration requirements of former R.C. 2950.04 through former R.C. 2950.07. When the defendant was convicted of a sexually-oriented offense...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• 7 CFR 201.48 - Kind or variety considered pure seed.

...For classification of broken pieces of seed units one-half or less th...For visibly empty fruits, refer to inert matter, ? 201.51(a)(6);. (g) Seed units of the grass fami...

• Code of Federal Regulations - Title 7: Agriculture

• In re Hawkins, (Ohio 2008)

SEX OFFENSES: The sexually-oriented-offender classification arises as a matter of law, and no hearing is required to determine whether a defendant is a sexually-oriented offender. Under former R.C. Chapter 2950, if a defendant had been convicted of a sexually-oriented offense as defined in former R.C. 2901(D) and was not a habitual sexual offender or a sexual predator, the sexually-oriented-offender classification attached by operation of law. Under former R.C. Chapter 2950, once a defendant had been convicted of a sexually-oriented offense, he was automatically classified as a sexually-oriented offender, and he was required to comply with the registration requirements of former R.C. 2950.04 through former R.C. 2950.07. When the defendant was convicted of a sexually-oriented offense...

• Ohio Supreme Court

• In the Matter of Andrew S. Criscolo v. Nicholas J. Vagianelis, as Director of the Division of Classification and Compensation of the Department of Civil Service, No. 20 (N.Y. 2009)

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------...

• New York Court of Appeals

• In re C.A., (Ohio 2009)

Juvenile’s adjudication for rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b), was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The juvenile court properly considered juvenile’s prior adjudication for a sexually oriented offense in determining that designation as a juvenile offender registrant was mandatory. Juvenile court erred in concluding that it was required to classify juvenile as a Tier III sex offender due to the offense for which he was adjudicated. Juvenile court was authorized by statute to require juvenile to register for a period beyond child’s twenty-first birthday. Judgment of adjudication affirmed. The matter will be remanded to the trial court for a new classification hearing.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Is It Suv, Sedan or Wagon?

No matter what you choose to call it in terms of its classification, Ford's new Freestyle rides and handles much like one would expect from an upscale sedan, while providing the versatility and functionality of an SUV. The interior configuration is on the order of yesterday's traditional station wagon in terms of general layout, but it is more commodious, not to mention considerably more refined.

• The Washington Times
• June 03, 2005