-
The despite the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which have been weakened in the decades since their passage.
In the upcoming Senate vote, just weeks away, our senators will either take a stand for fair pay, or they will favor discrimination.
-
[...] Reid read bis scripted comments from his lectern in the Senate chamber. Did Reid also forget what party Lyndon Johnson worked with to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only passed but even to get it through committee and onto the floor for a vote? A key Democratic opponent - Sen. Robert Byrd (D.-W.Va.), a former Klansman - still serves today and is third in the presidential line of succession as the Senate's president pro tern.
-
Eyman's brigade facing stiff challenge
Did the women's suffrage movement of the early 1900's result in preferential treatment to women? Of course not. The eminently proper reform allowed women to vote, just like men. Did the Civil Rights Act of 1964 grant preferential treatment to people of color? Of course not. It granted them equality, prohibiting segregation in public places and processes.
-
The votes of Maine's Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins can be decisive in the current flurry of issues on which the Bush administration is desperately seeking victory: the John Bolton nomination for United Nations ambassador, controversial judicial nominations, an administration attack on the filibuster rule and partial privatization of Social Security.
We may not know for a long time what sort of behind-the-scenes horse trading may be taking place this time, but a look at history can be instructive. Forty years ago, President Lyndon B. Johnson, an expert on what buttons to push to whip reluctant members of Congress into line, needed a few more votes to break a long Southern filibuster and win enactment of the historic Civil Rights Act of 1964. Cloture in those days required a two-t...
-
ONE of the most difficult aspects of living in a diverse society is how we measure the people and events that make up our shared history. Since various communities have different heroes and views of the past, one dilemma is in how to determine the significance of our public figures.
Although it is hard to see now, the debates and issues that we struggle with will have a significance in the future that we cannot control or completely foresee. Authority without morality will eventually be discredited. Who would have believed back in the late '50s and early '60s that Martin Luther King would eventually be celebrated and the then powerful J. Edgar Hoover discredited. Perhaps that is what Dr. King meant when he said "the arc of the universe is long but it bends toward justice.
..., he would undoubtedly be remembered for his vote against the appointment of Justice Thurgood Marsha... the Supreme Court, for his filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and vote against the Voting Right...
-
... Race-Conscious Concerns About the Form of Civil Rights Interventions D. Transporting the Logic of .... --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. (1964) (1) . We believe, like Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr...The Justices who vote against affirmative action and other race-consciou...
-
The first redemption period started just before the Fifteenth Amendment was passed in 1869 when whites protested social equality as not including the right to vote. Once political equality was law, Southerners began a national campaign to "redeem" while rights and the social protocols of Antebellum America. "Private spaces" began to be protected as separation policy became both law and culture. Those who advance the agenda of "whites rights" were known as "redeemers" and they sought to redeem the nations from the "Black equality" movement that the Reconstruction Period had ushered in. "Whiles tights" became the national referendum of the president ial election of 1876, but the cultural movement had already spread throughout the South. Only three stales (South Carolina. Florida and Louis...
... who is America, as it relates Io rights - civil rights particular. The ultra conservative fringe, ... comments on whether he'd support die 1964 Civil Rights Act as it related to enforcing anti-d...
-
... . Section 706 (c) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Act) provides that in the case... sufficient support to achieve the two-thirds vote necessary for cloture.[Footnote 29] This effort wa...
-
A coalition of local churches announced Wednesday it has filed a complaint to federal agencies alleging the Beavercreek City Council violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by denying an application to install three public bus stops near the Mall at Fairfield Commons.
An attorney for Leaders for Equality and Action in Dayton Inc., or LEAD, held a press conference on the steps of the Tony Hall Federal Building in Dayton to announce that the council's March 28 vote to reject the Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority's request for the bus stops near the mall constituted discrimination.
-
Although Arizona Senator Goldwater voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it was the Republican Party that fought to get it passed. 1964 was a seminal year in United States politics, and African Americans, led by Kennedyesque northern liberals, dixiecrats, and civil rights Negro leaders, got corralled, and, as a result, politically and economically marginalized; a condition which has so exacerbated that today prisons are filled with African American males, mental and physical health issues devastate our people, and inner cities are being gentrified.
With Kennedy in the White House and dixiecrats still controlling both the house and senate during the early 1960's, African American students in the south went to jail for trying to use public libraries, hospitals, and parks. Registeri...