© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
- Language
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
In employment law cases, the power of the law extends far beyond the boundaries of written contracts. Although breach-of-contract claims remain common in the employment law context, there has been a spike in the number of cases in which a former employee alleges that a former employer broke the law even though there is no written contract in place to support that contention. In these cases, the key factor is the reasonable expectations of the parties, and not what the contract says. When an employee has a reasonable expectation of some benefit, that expectation may be enforceable in court. The Oregon Supreme Court has long held that the law imposes a duty of good faith and fair dealing in the performance of every contract. The purpose of the duty of good faith and fair dealing is to eff...
Agreements requiring employees to repay training costs to their employers, if they separate from employment before a specified period, have become increasingly familiar in the American workplace. The types of training that are potentially subject to repayment commitments can vary significantly. One source of potential constraints on repayment agreements is the law of restrictive covenants. Typically, such covenants temporarily prohibit employees from competing, post-termination, with their former employers. Another question frequently arising in litigation concerning repayment agreements, is whether the stipulated recoupment amount qualifies as an appropriate measure of damages under contract law for the breach of the service requirement. In cases involving mandatory training and assump...
Civ. R. 53(E): an objecting party to a magistrate's findings of fact must supply the trial court with a transcript of the proceedings before the magistrate. Trial court may not make additional, unsubstantiated findings if there was no such finding made by the magistrate and if the findings are not otherwise supported by the record. Prejudgment interest for breach of contract cases is treated as a matter of law.
Mark E. Goodman and Gary R. Sarachan, of Capes, Sokol, Goodman & Sarachan, PC., have been named as co-chairs of the law firm's Litigation Practice Area. Goodman has litigated for 34 years representing clients in personal injury cases in the areas of medical negligence, inadequate security, railroad accidents, and product liability. In addition, he has tried numerous commercial cases in the areas of employment law, patent infringement, contract disputes, breach of fiduciary duty, and investor fraud. He has obtained more than 15 verdicts or settlements in excess of $1 million for clients. He holds a B.A. from Northwestern University and a J.D. from Washington University School of Law. Goodman has served as an adjunct professor at Saint Louis University School of Law.
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) annually publishes one or more notices apportioning funds appropriated by law. In some cases, if less than a full year of funds is available, FTA publishes multiple partial apportionment notices. This notice is the first notice announcing partial apportionment for programs funded with Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 contract authority because the current authorization of FTA's programs provides contract authority for the period October 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012. Additionally, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012, provides full-year funding for FTA's programs funded from the General Fund of the United States Treasury, which are Administrative Expenses, the New Starts and Research programs and grants to the Washington Metropo...
Introduction. II. Why Interest Arbitration Is Necessary Under The NLRA. A. The Problem of First Contract Negotiation. B. The Weakness of NLRB Remedies. C. Arbitration Is Desirable When Work Stoppages Are Not. 1. The Unavailability of Strikes. 2. Arbitration Is Widely Used When Strikes Are Undesirable. III. Interest Arbitration Will Work. A. Interest Arbitration Will Provide Incentives to Bargain; It Will Not Remove the Incentives to Bargain. 1. Theoretical Underpinnings. 2. Case Studies. 3. Final-Offer Arbitration: A Potential Procedure for Implementation. B. Interest Arbitration Can Produce a Sensible Contract. C. Interest Arbitration Is Better than the Alternatives. 1. Arbitration Is Expeditious and Affordable. 2. Arbitration Should Not Be Limited to Cases in Which Bad Faith Bargai...
... Money, Ex Post Facto Laws, Impairing Contracts . Clause 1. No State shall enter into any Treaty,... make the principle applicable in very many cases. . Changes in Procedure .-An accused person does ...
Art Mistake And Mix-Up Stories II. Proposed Model Act´S Provisions Regarding Parentage III. Statutory And Common Law Inadequacy In Art Mix-Up Cases A. Contract 1. In case I am mistakenly given the wrong gamete or wrong embryo: 2. In case my gamete or embryo is mistakenly given to someone else: B. Intent Standard C. Statutory Uniform Parentage Act (UPA) Provisions D. Genetics IV. Proposed Alternative A. A Labor-Based Theory of Parentage B. Proposed Labor-Based Priorities C. Relational, Child-Centeredness V. Conclusion
§ 27.1 Introduction to Substantive Due Process Doctrine: § 27.1.1 Introduction to Fundamental Rights Doctrine. § 27.1.2 Non-Fundamental Rights Doctrine: § 27.1.2.1 Economic and Social Legislation under the Due Process Clause. § 27.1.2.2 The Birth, Life, and Death of the Irrebuttable Presumption Doctrine. § 27.1.2.3 Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine. § 27.1.2.4 Unconstitutionality of Excessive Punitive Damages Awards. § 27.2 Enumerated Fundamental Rights Under Substantive Due Process: § 27.2.1 The Original Natural Law Era. § 27.2.2 The Formalist Era. § 27.2.3 The Holmesian Era. § 27.2.4 The Instrumentalist Era. § 27.2.5 The Modern Natural Law Era: § 27.2.5.1 Selective Incorporation and the Modern Natural Law Era. § 27.2.5.2 Non-Bill of Rights "Enumerated" Fundamental Rights and the Mo...
... interpretation in the Slaughter-House Cases in 1873. Since 1876, the Court has provided this ..., where a smoker who contracted cancer and brought an action against Philip Morris...
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company