business record exception to hearsay

• State v. Wilson, (Ohio 2006)

Receiving stolen property; license plate; business record exception to hearsay; validation sticker; dispatch report.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Baker, (Ohio 2003)

Crim.R. 16 – right to discovery – defendant must move for discovery – business record exception to hearsay rule – Evid.R. 803(6) – defendant has burden of demonstrating error by citing legal authority – admissibility of photographs

• Ohio Supreme Court

• The admissibility of expert opinion and the bases of expert opinion in sex offender civil management trials in New York.

... attorney; (3) an excerpt of a note in a business record created by a social worker at Montefiore Me... with the professional reliability exception to the hearsay rule which, when met, allows expert...

• Albany Law Review
• Vol. 75 Nbr. 2, December 2011

• State v. Breckenridge, (Ohio 2006)

Appellant's convictions for Medicaid fraud were not against the manifest weight of the evidence and trial court did ot err in admitting calendar under Evid.R. 603(6) as business record exception to the hearsay rule.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Maryland Court of Special Appeals Case Summaries: July 17, 2011

Administrative Law Discovery

...Both parties filed exceptions to the ALJ's proposed decision. The Board upheld t... if the record fits within Maryland's business record's exception to the hearsay rule, such state...

• The Daily Record (Baltimore)
• July 24, 2011

• State v. Crager, (Ohio 2005)

Upon review of the record, we find that Duvall’s report should not have been admitted under the business record exception to the hearsay rule and that Weichman did not have personal knowledge of the actual DNA tests performed. Accordingly, we sustain Crager’s second assignment of error and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Call, (Ohio 2005)

Trial court abused its discretion when it excluded evidence of Defendant’s record of child support payments, or non-payments, for lack of a foundation, when the record was admissible under the business records exception to the rule against hearsay, Evid.R. 803(6); therefore, the child support clerk could, as she did, testify from that record, and her testimony established a non-support of his dependant of which Defendant was convicted. Judgment affirmed. (J. Fain concurring.)

• Ohio Supreme Court

• U.S. v. Blechman, (10th Cir. 2011)

... at trial showed that Yass operated a business that he used to temporarily halt home foreclosures... Yass, Public Access to Court Electronic Records ("PACER") records suggesting that Blechman accesse... that these records contained double hearsay and that the district court erroneously admitted tthem under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. See ...

• Federal Circuits

• Beneficial Ohio, Inc. v. Hadbavny, (Ohio 2010)

CIVIL - summary judgment; foreclosure; affidavit; first hand knowledge; custodian; strike; hearsay; business record exception; boilerplate; authenticate; foundation sufficient; Civ.R. 56(E); competent; extension of time; leave to amend; deny; no abuse of discretion.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Wrestling With MRE 304(G): The Struggle to Apply the Corroboration Rule

... of the corpus delecti rule with the exception of Massachusetts. 22 Moreover, while English cou... Court found independent evidence in the record to support Opper's statements which was sufficient...139 The drug screen results were hearsay. 130. See United States v. Smith, 348 U.S. 147 (1... results under MRE 803(6) 141 as a "business record" exception to the hearsay rule. The drug s...

• Military Law Review
• Nbr. 178, December 2003