Brief of Petitioners

• Lawrence v. Texas

...In its original brief filed with this court, the State contends that sec...Supreme Court. Brief of Petitioners. . In the Supreme Court of the United States. JOH...

• West's Encyclopedia of American Law
• Milestones in the Law

• In the Supreme Court of the United States: No. 04-1704: DaimlerChrysler Corporation, et al., Petitioners, v. Charlotte Cuno, et al., Respondents: brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curiae in support of petitioners: interest of amicus curiae.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 04-1704 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLOTTE CUNO, et al., Respondents...

• Tax Executive
• Vol. 57 Nbr. 6, November 2005

• Brief for the petitioners: Gonzales v. State of Oregon *.

OPINIONS BELOW The opinion of the court of appeals is reported at 368 F.3d 1118. The order of the district court granting respondents' motion for su...

• Issues in Law & Medicine
• Vol. 21 Nbr. 1, June 2005

• Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc., 566 U.S. (2012)

...1 . TAMMY FORET FREEMAN, ET AL., PETITIONERS v.QUICKEN LOANS, INC.ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE ... See Reply Brieffor Petitioners 6. But then is not the provider also "...

• U.S. Supreme Court

• Brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curiae in support of petitioners: interest of amicus curiae.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 04-1704 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. CHARLOTTE CUNO, et al., Respondents...

• Tax Executive
• Vol. 57 Nbr. 4, July 2005

• Michael A. Zapara and Gina A. Zapara, Petitioners V. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent*

In the Zapara v. Commr. case, the Tax Court held that the petitioners' citation of Section 6335(f) on reply brief did not raise a new issue but appealed to the correct application of law. The petitioners' request to sell the stock complied with the requirements of Section 6335(f). The relief provided in Zapara I was not an award of damages but specific relief to provide the petitioners the credit to which they would have been entitled if the IRS had complied with the petitioners' request to sell the stock. By failing to adhere to the statutory mandate of Section 6335(f), the IRS frustrated the petitioners' ability to use the stock to defray their tax liabilities and increased their risk with respect to the stock; accordingly, the IRS is treated as assuming the risk of loss with respect ...

• United States. Tax Court. Reports
• Vol. 126 Nbr. 3/4, March 2006

• Brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curiae insupport of petitioners: interest of amicus curiae.

On August 9, 2002, Tax Executives Institute filed a brief amicus curiae in support of the petitioners with the Supreme Court of the United States in B...

• Tax Executive
• Vol. 54 Nbr. 5, September 2002

• New York Times v. Sullivan

... is invited to study the court opinions and briefs* that shaped a major facet of First Amendment law....Supreme Court. Brief for the Petitioners. . In the Supreme Court of the United StatesOctob...

• West's Encyclopedia of American Law
• Milestones in the Law

• Brief of Tax Executives Institute, Inc. as amicus curiae in support of petitioners interest of amicus curiae.

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. 01-1209 The Boeing Company And Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioners, v. United States of America, Resp...

• Tax Executive
• Vol. 54 Nbr. 2, March 2002

• In The Supreme Court of the United States No. 01-1061 Programmed Land, Inc., Et Al., Petitioners, v. Patrick O'Connor, Treasurer and Auditor, Hennepin County, Et Al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota Brief Of Amicus Curiae Tax Executives Institute, Inc. In Support Of Petitioners: Interest Of Amicus Curiae.

On February 19, 2002, Tax Executives Institute filed the following brief amicus curiae with the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the cons...

• Tax Executive
• Vol. 54 Nbr. 2, March 2002