Brief for Appellant 4

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for Brief for Appellant 4

- Davis v. Federal Election Comm’n, 554 U.S. (2008)
...Appellant Davis, a candidate for a House seat in 2004 and 20... Lyons , 461 U. S. 95, 102. Davis faced the requisite injury fr...In his brief, Davis discloses having spent $1.2 million, princi...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- United States v. Stevens, 559 U. S. (2010)
...New York v. Ferber, 458 U. S. 747, distinguished. Pp. 5–9. (b) S...See Brief for United States 25, n. 7 (listing statutes). Bu...�2497 (CA3), p. 28 (opposing “the appellant’s facial challenge”); accord, Brief for United Sta...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit Case Summaries: April 20, 2012
AdministrativeMedicaid ReimbursementPooled Special-Needs TrustEstoppel (1)Where a district court, in a dispute over the effect of a pooled special needs trust created by an over-65 beneficiary on his Medicaid benefits, ruled that the state was entitled to reimbursement and that its regulations were consistent with the Medicaid Act, the court properly found that a non-profit trust administration center had standing to sue because the state might seek reimbursement in the future and because the state's regulations might deter individuals from transferring their funds to the center, and the state did not meet its burden to show mootness.(2)Where a non-profit trust administration center argued that a state waived its claim and was equitiably estopped from demanding reimbursement because it ...

...Chandler, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant; Thomas E. Perez, Samuel R. Bagenstos and Dennis JJ. Dimsey appeared on the brief) (Brandon W. Lacy, Jonesboro, Arkansas, argued for...
- Missouri Lawyers Media
- April 27, 2012

- Heckler v. Mathews, 465 U.S. 728 (1984)
... Mark I. Levy argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Skinner v. Mid-America Pipeline Co., 490 U.S. 212 (1989)
... General Merrill argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were former Solicitor Gene...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Moore v. East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977)
... . Appellant lives in her East Cleveland, Ohio, home with her s...With him on the brief were Francis D. Murtaugh, Jr., and Lloyd B. Snyder...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Roach v. CUNA Mutual, (1st Cir. 2010)
...09-2022. CHERISE ROACH,. Plaintiff, Appellant,. v. CUNA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., INC., ET AL.,. Def...brief, for appellant. Edward C. Cooley, with who...unknown, 49 U.S.C. § 32705(a)(1)(A) and (B), and gives a tra...
- Federal Circuits
- Federal Election Comm'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. (2007)
...S. 410, 412. On remand, the District Court granted WRTL s...Pp. 10-22. . . (a) Appellants are wrong in arguing that WRTL has the burden of d... it calls a "grassroots lobbying campaign," Brief for Appellee 8, WRTL began broadcasting a radio ad...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Little v. Streater, 452 U.S. 1 (1981)
... birth to a female child, she identified appellant as the father to the Connecticut Department of Soc...948, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Stephen J. McGovern, Assistant Att...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252 (1980)
...Ryan, Jr., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General McC...
- U.S. Supreme Court