© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
- Language
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
breach of contract
8 similar searches for breach of contract
1 headnote for breach of contract
More than 10.000 documents for breach of contract
-
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) is amending the regulations issued under the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended and supplemented (P&S Act). GIPSA is amending the regulations to clarify conditions for industry compliance with the P&S Act pursuant to the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). In response to comments and other public input received in response to the proposed rule published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2010, making necessary changes. The provisions finalized with this action will clarify conditions for industry compliance with the P&S Act. Other provisions listed in the June 22, 2010, proposed rule are not being finalized at this time.
-
In a recent case where Canisius College filed a lawsuit against The Vanguard Group, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York found no merit to the college's claim that Vanguard failed to comply with the terms of the prospectus. In granting Vanguard's motion to dismiss Canisius' breach of contract claim in Canisius College v. The Vanguard Group, U.S. District Judge William M. Skretny held that Canisius failed to comply with the terms of the prospectus since it did not make its redemption request five business days prior to the date it wanted to have the proceeds wired to its bank account.
-
A Greene County circuit judge ordered a local bank to pay more than $210,000 in damages to a car dealership over claims that the bank withheld interest owed on car financing agreements the bank handled for the dealer. H&H Motors Inc. sued the Bank of Thayer alleging breach of contract on two agreements in Howell County Circuit Court in February 2009. The case soon moved to Greene County at the bank's request.
-
Conclusion The appeals court, therefore, concluded that the contract was void because "Interboro's bags were not of the thickness reguired by the bid specifications." Since "Interboro's bid did not substantially comply with the call for bids," the appeals court affirmed the summary judgment of the district court effectively dismissing Interboro's breach- of- contract claim.
