boykin v. alabama

1 similar search for boykin v. alabama

boykin v alabama

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

1.676 documents for boykin v. alabama

- Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court BOYKIN v. ALABAMA, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) 395 U.S. 238 [Page 395 U.S. 238, 239] E. Graham Gibbons, b...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- in Re Wesley Industries, Inc., Debtor. Robert M. Galloway, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. First Alabama Bank, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, Jack W. Boykin, Defendant., 30 F.3d 1438 (11th Cir. 1994)
Robert M. Galloway, pro se. Eileen W. Stockham, Collins, Galloway & Smith, Mobile, AL, for appellant. Robert P. Reynolds, P.C., Huntsville, AL, for a...
- Federal Circuits
- Eighth Amendment: Further Guarantees In Criminal Cases
...86, 99 (1958). . In Rudolph v. Alabama, 375 U.S. 889 (1963), Justices Goldberg, Douglas, ... was the basis for grant of review in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969) and Maxwell v. Bis...
- Constitution of the United States (Annotated)

- State v. Madaris, (Ohio 2004)
A rote recitation of those rights contained in Crim.R.11(C) and mandated by Boykin v. Alabama (1969), 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, is not required for a valid explanation of a defendant’s constitutional rights; the test is whether the trial court explained or referred to the rights in a manner reasonably intelligible to the defendant. The trial court’s use of the phrase “made to testify” effectively conveyed the meaning of “compelled to testify,” as specified in Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c), and its use of the phrases “see the witnesses against you here in open court” and “cross-examined” also effectively conveyed the meanings required by the criminal rule; the trial court’s choice of words was more understandable for one with a limited education and thereby satisfied the requirements of the ru...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Florida v. Nixon, 543 U.S. ___ (2004)
...Under Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 , 242-243, consent t...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002)
... accompanying constitutional guarantees, Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238, 243. As a result, the C...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- USA v. Martinez, (3rd Cir. 2012)
...R. Crim. P. 11(b) and Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). The Court informe...
- Federal Circuits
- Gonzalez v. United States, 553 U.S. (2008)
...See Powell v. Alabama , 287 U. S. 45, 68-69 (1932); ABA Standards for Cr...Equally inapposite is Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 (1969), which held that ...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74 (2004)
...Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238, 243 (1969). We do not s...
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20 (1992)
... did not affirmatively show, as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238 , that the pleas were k...
- U.S. Supreme Court