Bill of Particulars

• 18 USC 3366 - Sec. 3366. Bill of particulars - (Rule)

• U.S. Code - Title 18: Crimes and Criminal Procedure

• State v. Garfield, (Ohio 2011)

sufficiency, manifest weight, rape, Evid.R. 403, expert testimony, bill of particulars, ineffective assistance of counsel

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Bill of particulars.

In a campaign season of "surprise surprise!" six-figure bank accounts, $2,000 may not amount to much, but it has given GOP gubernatorial candidate Joh...

• New Hampshire Business Review
• October 08, 2010

• Bill of Particulars

A written statement used in both civil and criminal actions that is submitted by a plaintiff or a prosecutor at the request of a d...

• West's Encyclopedia of American Law
• Be

• State v. Hedges, (Ohio 2013)

Motion to Suppress; Bill of Particulars

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Prosecution's Amendment to Bill of Particulars Did Not Result in Undue Prejudice to Defendant

Where the defendant was convicted of conspiracy and criminal possession of a controlled substance, the prosecution was allowed to amend the bill of particulars to allege the defendant constructively possessed cocaine seized from a vehicle from which he was a passenger. The court also determined it was error to deny the defendant's request for a circumstantial evidence charge with respect to the criminal possession counts of the indictment.

• Daily Record (Rochester, NY)
• August 04, 2004

• State v. Turner, (Ohio 2011)

CRIMINAL - Felonious Assault; Kidnapping; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; bill of particulars; indictment; jury instructions; safe place unharmed; R.C. 2905.01(C); ineffective assistance of counsel

• Ohio Supreme Court

• Mayfield Hts. v. Barry, (Ohio 2011)

STRICT LIABILITY OFFENSES; NO CULPABLE MENTAL STATE; STATE V. HORNER; VIOLATION OF BUILDING CODE; NOTICE OF VIOLATION; UNFAIR SURPRISE; WEIGHT OF EXPERT TESTIMONY; JURY INSTRUCTIONS; JURY QUESTIONS; PLEA AGREEMENT; BILL OF PARTICULARS; PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT; “OTHER ACTS” EVIDENCE; VOID FOR VAGUENESS; EQUAL PROTECTION/SELECTIVE PROSECUTION; INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL; CUMULATIVE ERROR.

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Hoang, (Ohio 2012)

motion to dismiss – speedy trial – R.C. 2945.71 – merger of counts – allied offenses of similar import – indictment – fatally defective on its face – overt acts – bill of particulars – disclose exculpatory evidence – motion to disclose identity of confidential informants – motion to suppress – search warrant – affidavit – lack of specificity – standing – forfeiture – App.R. 16(A)(7)

• Ohio Supreme Court

• State v. Pence, (Ohio 2013)

Gross sexual imposition, conviction, pre-arrest, pre-Miranda silence, Fifth Amendment, self-incrimination, privilege, voluntarily, prejudice, plain error, comment, opening statement, closing argument, direct examination, children's services worker, testimonial, nontestimonial, medical diagnosis, summary, inference, prosecutorial misconduct, ongoing, course, conduct, time frame, bill of particulars, detail, manifest weight, sufficiency, child-victim.

• Ohio Supreme Court