bell vs wolfish 1979

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

48 documents for bell vs wolfish 1979

- War Is Not a Criminal Trial
According to U.S. District Court Judge Joyce Hens Green in In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases (Jan. 31), war is akin to a collective criminal prosecution. Thus, captured enemy aliens held at Guantanamo Bay are crowned with a right to counsel with access to classified information and a right to suppress coerced confessions to challenge their status as enemy combatants.

...In Bell vs. Wolfish (1979), the court explained a sanction...
- The Washington Times
- February 08, 2005
- Azim Hall vs The People &c., 1 No. 29 (N.Y. 2008)
...In Bell v Wolfish (441 US 520 [1979]), the United States S...
- New York Court of Appeals
- The law and economics of the exclusionary rule.
... lost arrests in California from 1976 through 1979 by the National Institute of Justice found that 6%.... (256) See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 559 (1979). . (257) See ...
- Notre Dame Law Review
- Vol. 87 Nbr. 2, December 2011

- Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to an Exploration Drilling Program in the Chukchi Sea, Alaska
NMFS received an application from Shell Offshore Inc. (Shell) for an Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to take marine mammals, by harassment, incidental to offshore exploration drilling on Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) leases in the Chukchi Sea, Alaska. Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS is requesting comments on its proposal to issue an IHA to Shell to take, by Level B harassment only, 12 species of marine mammals during the specified activity.

... Richardson et al., 1995a; Burns and Frost, 1979, cited in Richardson et al., 1995a). Richardson et...altitude overflights of a Bell 212 helicopter at Northstar in June and July 2000 ..., mackerel, salmon, sand lance, saury, and wolfish) (Reeves et al., 2002). Fin whales tend to feed in...
- Federal Register Nbr. 76 FR 69958, November 09, 2011
- Notices
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Gonzales vs. Pace, (5th Cir. 2007)
...See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 554 (1979). Accordingly,...
- Federal Circuits
- Grabowski vs. Jackson County PDO, (5th Cir. 1995)
...357, 98 S.Ct. 663, 54 L.Ed 2d 604 (19798). As long as the prosecution has probable cause to.... In Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 s.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2...
- Federal Circuits
- Donald Eldrenal Jenkins, Petitioner, vs. State of Florida, Respondent, (2008)
.... - 19 -. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 559 (1979). . In this ...
- Florida Supreme Court
- Moore vs. Frasier, (5th Cir. 2004)
...Bell v. Wolfish , 441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979). The effecti...
- Federal Circuits
- David R. Ruiz, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee, v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants., 679 F.2d 1115 (5th Cir. 1982)
...-month recess, was completed on September 20, 1979. Three hundred forty-nine witnesses testified and ... 2 See Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 562, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1886...
- Federal Circuits
- Scott vs. Moore, (5th Cir. 1996)
... the reasonable relationship standard of Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.22d 447 (1979). . A. . Deliberate indifference is the proper s...
- Federal Circuits