Bank One Capital V

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for Bank One Capital V

- Barrepski v. Capital One Bank, (1st Cir. 2011)
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 10-2249 FRANK M. BARREPSKI,...
- Federal Circuits
- RAQUEL RUBIO V. CAPITAL ONE BANK, (9th Cir. 2010)
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAQUEL RUBIO, on behalf of ï£¼ herself an...
- Federal Circuits
- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., f/k/a Capital One Bank, and Capital One, N.A., as Successor to Capital One F.S.B, petitioners, v. Commissioner of Revenue of Massachusetts, respondent. On petition for a writ of certiorari to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
BRIEF OF TAX EXECUTIVES INSTITUTE, INC. AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONER Interest of Amicus Curiae Pursuant to Rule 37 of the Rules o...
- Tax Executive
- Vol. 61 Nbr. 3, May 2009

- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Tenney, (Ohio 2011)
OTHER CIVIL RULES - Civ.R. 56; unverified documents submitted in support of summary judgment may not be considered by trial court on summary judgment; where movant fails to submit evidentiary materials in support of its request for summary judgment, burden does not shift to nonmovant to demonstrate existence of genuine issue of material fact.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Collins, (Ohio 2011)
Arbitration, Agreement, R.C. 2711.02, Final Appealable Order, Motion to Stay.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Capital One Bank v. Graham, (Ohio 2011)
default judgment vacate Civ.R. 60(B)(5) meritorious defense credit card
- Ohio Supreme Court
- State ex rel. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. v. Karner, (Ohio 2011)
National Bank located in Virginia sought writs of prohibition and mandamus to prevent trial court from holding a sanctions hearing for failing to respond to a subpoena in an Ohio divorce case. This court held that on the issue of service, the banks actual receipt of a subpoena vested the trial court with sufficient jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction. Because divorce actions and sanctions hearings are within the classes of cases that the respondent judge could adjudicate, she had basic subject matter jurisdiction, and the writs would not issue. Because the bank has minimum contacts with Ohio, lack of personal jurisdiction would not provide a sufficient basis for a writ of prohibition. Although the bank sought to characterize the issue as one of subject matter jurisdictio...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Rodgers, (Ohio 2010)
Credit Card Dispute; S/L choice of law
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Capital One Bank v. Toney, (Ohio 2007)
Court failed to direct clerk to serve appellant or his counsel by endorsing such direction on judgment; Clerk failed to note service in docket; Insufficient account record attached to credit card company’s complaint under Civ.R. 10(D); Unanswered interrogatories cannot be used as admissions against party whose motion for a more definite statement due to lack of attached account was still pending; No obligation to respond to the merits of instanter summary judgment motion until court grants leave to file such motion.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Capital One Bank v. Zavatchen, (Ohio 2008)
Request for Admissions; complaint on account; collection
- Ohio Supreme Court