-
State and local authorities announced Thursday in San Bernardino that they've made several arrests and seized hundreds of weapons and drugs in connection with an 18-month, seven-county investigation into the Vagos .
The investigation, code-named "Simple Green," resulted in 52 search warrants and 12 arrest warrants served today in the seven counties in Southern California, including San Bernardino, authorities said during a press conference at San Bernardino Police Department.
-
Los Angeles County. Sheriff's detectives are trying to find Jennifer Huei Chen, 52, who is allegedly responsible for stealing about $3 million from victims. Deputies say she befriends elderly Asian couples and offers them fraudulent investment opportunities that costs them their life savings.
The crimes occurred from December 2000 to March 2007. Chen is known to frequent casinos in California and Las Vegas. Warrants are issued for her arrest.
-
... of constitutional limits on government arrest and search powers, they have already drained those... seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by...California (47) when, over the lone dissent of the first Just...
-
SAN FRANCISCO -- Police may enter Californians' homes without warrants to arrest those suspected of driving under the influence, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday, 6-1, in a case testing the scope of the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Under the Fourth Amendment, authorities are prohibited from entering a home and making an arrest without a warrant unless so- called "exigent" circumstances are present. Those include imminent destruction of evidence. In this case, the loss of evidence at issue was obtaining a measurement of the suspect's blood-alcohol level.
-
..., with a home address in Hercules, California. The manager reported, for example, that Johnigan ... of crack, an outstanding warrant for his arrest for violating his parole, and three outstanding arrrest warrants for traffic violations in Kansas City. On January ...
-
RIVERSIDE, Calif., Aug. 10, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Wednesday, August 10, 2011, more than 200 federal, state, and local law enforcement officers served search and arrest warrants, and conducted parole searches at over 40 locations in Riverside and surrounding areas. The operation targeted a violent street gang that for decades has plagued the east side community with violence and narcotics trafficking.
In 2010, the City of Riverside saw an increase in criminal activity by the 1200 Blocc Crips criminal street gang. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Special Services Unit (CDCR-SSU), and the Riverside Police Department joined forces to initiate and complete a six month investigation targeting th...
-
... to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King's process. Most famous of t... state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search ...In Ker v. California , the Court considered the rule of announcement a...
-
California Highway Patrol officers will seek out and serve warrants to people who have been charged with driving under the influence but failed to appear in court.
In an effort to encourage traffic safety and hold drunken drivers accountable, warrants will be issued by the court for an arrest, according to a CHP news release.
-
... reversal were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve Wh... dangerous and difficult process of making arrests and executing search warrants.[Footnote 11]. In H...
-
The Framers designed the Fourth Amendment to protect people against warrantless searches, General Warrants, and Writs of Assistance. They intended that police would have to secure search warrants unless an emergency justified an exception. In Chimel v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court followed the intent of the Framers in creating a limited search-incident-to-arrest exception to the warrant requirement that was justified by legitimate rationales. However, in decisions following Chimel, the Supreme Court has expanded the allowable scope of searches incident to arrest and has moved away from the strict adherence to the Chimel rationales. In State v. Sykes, the Wisconsin Supreme Court followed the U.S. Supreme Court's lead, authorizing a search wholly unsupported by the historical unders...