appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court

- Of Civil Unions
Same-sex couples whose out-of-state, legally recognized relationships failed may formally dissolve them in New York courts. While New York has recognized civil unions from other states, it hasn't been clear whether those relationships could be dissolved in New York or if couples would have to return to the jurisdiction that granted the union. The Appellate Division, Third Department has ruled the dissolution of a civil union is within a supreme court's jurisdiction.
- Daily Record (Rochester, NY)
- July 29, 2011
- State v. Berry, (Ohio 2011)
Appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider defendant's appeal where the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of the trial court's judgment entry.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Memos Portray Roberts As Conservative but Cautious
After an exhaustive review at the Department of Justice I determined that such bills were within the constitutional power of Congress to fix the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, 'with Exception, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.' I also concluded that such bills were bad policy and should be opposed on policy grounds.
- Human Events
- August 05, 2009

- Supreme Court
... . Paragraph II. Exclusive appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court. The Supreme Court s...
- Georgia Constitution
- Brown v. E. Ohio Gas Co., (Ohio 2011)
The appellate court may sua sponte consider subject matter jurisdiction and appellants claim for negligent termination of gas services invokes the exclusion jurisdiction conferred on the Public Utility Commission of Ohio.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- On being "bound thereby".
... of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land. The judges in every state shall b...The Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction to review the de...
- Constitutional Commentary
- Vol. 27 Nbr. 3, December 2011
- State v. Gonzalez, (Ohio 2011)
APPELLATE REVIEW/CRIMINAL SENTENCING: The court of appeals had no jurisdiction to address defendants R.C. 2941.25 challenge to the imposition of sentences on both felonious-assault charges: the court had jurisdiction to review only the judgment from which defendant had appealed, and the common pleas court had not ruled upon, because defendant had not asserted in his postconviction motion, an allied-offenses challenge to his sentences; and while a trial court retains jurisdiction to correct a void judgment, the Ohio Supreme Court has not held that a judgment of conviction is rendered void by the imposition of multiple sentences in violation of R.C. 2941.25. The common pleas court erred in overruling defendants motion to vacate his sentences: the court had jurisdiction to correc...
- Ohio Supreme Court
- House Acts to Protect Pledge of Allegiance
A bill that would shield the Pledge of Allegiance from federal court rulings has been approved by the House. The measure would deny federal courts jurisdiction to hear or decide any questions pertaining to the interpretation or constitutionality of the pledge. The U.S. Supreme Court would not have appellate jurisdiction.
- Lawyers USA
- August 14, 2006
- In re T. H., (Ohio 2009)
The appellate court did not have jurisdiction to review appellant's assignment of error relating to the adjudication of dependency. Clear and convincing evidence existed to support the court's award of permanent custody to the agency where appellant failed to address mental health concerns. In re H.F.; App.R. 4(A); Juv.R. 29(D); mental health.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- House Judiciary Committee Approves State Marriage Protection Legislation
WASHINGTON, July 14 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The House Judiciary Committee today approved by a 21-to-13 margin legislation that would ensure States continue to decide state marriage policy. H.R. 3313, introduced by Rep. John Hostettler (R-Ind.) and amended today by the Committee, removes the federal courts' jurisdiction to hear cases involving the provision in the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) that allows States to decide whether to legally recognize out-of- state same-sex marriage licenses. Article III, Section 2, clause 2 of the Constitution provides that the lower federal courts are entirely creatures of Congress, as is the appellate jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court, excluding its very limited original jurisdiction.
- U.S. Newswire
- July 14, 2004