ADMIN. MISCELLANEOUS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CIVIL: The trial court did not improperly admit new evidence under R.C. 2506.03 when ruling on an administrative appeal pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2506; the court merely referred to legal authority not cited by the parties, which is not the type of new evidence contemplated by R.C. 2506.03. The trial court relied on a record containing reliable, probative, and substantial evidence when it upheld a property owners liability for her tenants unpaid charges owed to the Greater Cincinnati Water Works. No due-process violation resulted from a property owners failure to receive direct notice of a tenants unpaid charges of approximately $40,000 owed to the Greater Cincinnati Water Works, when the property owner ha...
... reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head. (b) No administrative stay is available foll...
...SUBCHAPTER E: ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES FOR FRAUDULENT CLAIMS OR STATEMENTS. PART... reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head. (b) No administrative stay is available foll...
In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (``CAA''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of two proposed settlement agreements to resolve two cases filed by the WildEarth Guardians (``Guardians'') involving EPA actions under the CAA Title V operating permit program. On November 17, 2010, Guardians filed a petition with the Environmental Appeals Board (``EAB'') challenging a Title V Renewal Permit issued by EPA Region 8 on October 18, 2010 to BP America Production Company (``BP'') for its Florida River Compression Station Facility (In re BP America Production Co., Florida River Compression Facility, Appeal No. CAA 10-04). On April 25, 2011, Guardians also filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (WildEarth Guardians v. EP...
... February 2, 2011 order denying an administrative petition to object to a July 14, 2010 response of ... 8 is the initial Part 71 permitting authority. Page 71028. DATES: Written comments on the propos...
Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Under R.C. 119.12, an administrative agency may bring an appeal from a decision of a court of common pleas on "questions of law relating to the constitutionality, construction or interpretation of statutes and rules of the agency." In this case, the common pleas court remanded the agency's decision based on its finding that the agency had violated the appellee's right to procedural due process. Although this decision was based on a question of law, it did not relate to the constitutionality, construction or interpretation of a statute or rule and, therefore, the agency lacked authority under the statute to bring the appeal.
...409. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY v. ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARM... CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 86-1715. Argued Februar... Ground refused to negotiate an administrative leave proposal by its employees' union because the...
... reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head. (b) No administrative stay is available foll...
... reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head. (b) No administrative stay is available foll...
... reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head. (b) No administrative stay is available foll...
... OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. PART 6301: BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. 6301.3 - Ju...The Administrative Judge assigned to hear an appeal has authority to ...
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other interesting searches:
The North Korea | 522 | quetiapine | The Geneva-based International Commission | Unico Properties, Inc. | representacion de funciones | las marcas mas caras del mundo | stoccarda germania | presles vercors
