actual malice defamation

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

1.630 documents for actual malice defamation

- Defamation Requires a False Statement Published with Actual Malice
Steam Press Holdings, Inc. v. Hawaii Teamsters and Allie Union, Local 996 - 2002 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9785 In September 1994, Michael D...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- United States Law Articles in English
- Georgalis v. Ohio Turnpike Comm., (Ohio 2010)
Defamation; qualified privilege; actual malice, tortious interference; wire tapping, R.C.. 2933.52(B)(4)
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Defamation Requires a False Statement Published with Actual Malice.
Steam Press Holdings, Inc. v. Hawaii Teamsters and Allie Union, Local 996 - 2002 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9785 In September 1994, Michael Drace purchase...
- Mondaq Business Briefing
- Nbr. 2002, June 2002

- Justices Dismiss Woodcliff Lake Cop's Defamation Suit ; Find He Didn't Prove 'Actual Malice' in Newsletter
WOODCLIFF LAKE - A defamation lawsuit filed by a borough police officer against a resident who was involved in a parking dispute was dismissed Tuesday by the New Jersey Supreme Court. The court found that Patrolman Dennis DeAngelis failed to prove that James F. Hill demonstrated "actual malice" when he published a newsletter saying the officer had perjured himself in Municipal Court when the parking ticket case was heard.
- The Record, Bergen County, NJ
- May 12, 2004
- Lansky v. Rizzo, (Ohio 2007)
Defamation; public figure; actual malice conspiracy.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Lansky v. Ciaravino, (Ohio 2008)
Summary judgment; defamation; public official; actual malice; reckless disregard; clear and convincing evidence; self-serving affidavit.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Roll Call Votes
HB 1286 - Prohibiting false and defamatory statements about candidates for public office This legislation, which passed the Senate by a vote of 44 to 1, would prohibit political advertising or campaign statements that are libelous or defamatory, and committed with actual malice. HB 1286 defines libel or defamation as statements that tend to expose a person to hatred, contempt, ridicule, to deprive him or her of public confidence or social interaction, or to injure him or her in his or her business or occupation. The proposal seeks to reinstate a previous state law that was thrown out on free speech grounds by the Washington Supreme Court in 2007. The bill previously passed the House by a vote of 92 to 2 and is being delivered to the governor for her signature.
- Yakima Herald-Republic
- April 28, 2009
- Daubenmire v. Sommers, (Ohio 2004)
Defamation; coach; limited purpose; public figure; actual; malice; qualified; privilege; R.C. 2305.11(A).
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Daff v. Associated Bldg. Suppliers, Inc., (Ohio 2007)
Defamation, qualified privilege, good faith, actual malice, R.C. 4141.21.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Lynch v. Studebaker, (Ohio 2007)
Age Discrimination, Public Policy, Defamation, Actual Malice, Retaliation, Adverse Employment Action, Compensatory Damages, Punitive Damages, Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, Motion for Direction Verdict, De Novo Standard of Review, Abuse of Discretion.
- Ohio Supreme Court