accident injury compensation

Receive alerts:
by e-mail
E-mail Your information will be added to a database with the sole purpose of serving your subscription. This database is the exclusive property of vLex Networks S.L. and will never be shared with any other company. By sending your request you accept the Data Protection Policy of vLex Networks S.L. I have read and accept the Terms of Use
via RSS

More than 10.000 documents for accident injury compensation

- Agency Information Collection (Report of Accidental Injury in Support of Claim for Compensation or Pension/Statement of Witness to Accident): Activity Under OMB Review
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument.
- Federal Register Nbr. 76 FR 73021, November 28, 2011
- Notices
- Veterans Affairs Department
- The Injury Lawyers Defends Whiplash Claims for Accident Compensation
To: BUSINESS EDITORS Contact: Brian Turner of Brite Media, 0845 4306340, pr@britemedia.co.uk
- U.S. Newswire
- February 19, 2010
- Supreme Court of Missour: Miller V. Mhtc
Workers' Compensation: Compensable Injury - 'Accident' - Knee Popping Where a worker experienced a popping in his knee as he walked on a job site for his work with a road crew, under the 2005 workers' compensation amendments, which narrowed the definition of "accident," the injury was not compensable because it did not arise out of his employment
- Missouri Lawyers Media
- September 14, 2009

- Sims v. Dibler, (Ohio 2007)
Personal injury complaint arising from car accident; plaintiff’s prior workers’ compensation claim was relevant to allege aggravated injury from car accident; if plaintiff raises a material issue during the direct examination of its witnesses, defendant cannot be prevented from discussing the same issue during cross-examination or rebuttal; trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling motion for a new trial when jury verdict was based primarily on plaintiff’s credibility and when that was undermined by plaintiff’s contradictory testimony.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Personal Injury Federation announces Clean-up For Accident Compensation Industry.
Business Editors BIRMINGHAM, England--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 3, 2003 A new body to self-regulate the troubled personal injury industry has been la...
- Business Wire
- September 03, 2003
- 20 CFR 61.203 - Limitations on and deductions from benefits.
...CHAPTER I: OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. SUBCHAPTER F: COMPEENSATION FOR INJURY, DISABILITY, DEATH, OR ENEMY DETENTION OF EMPLOYEE... benefits on account of a prior accident or disease sustains an injury compensable under th...
- Code of Federal Regulations - Title 20: Employees' Benefits
- Young v. Gorski, (Ohio 2004)
The trial court properly granted summary judgment in appellant’s tort case where the Bureau of Workers' Compensation determined that appellant suffered no injury in the accident. Res judicata; issue preclusion; mutuality; quasi-judicial agency.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Texas Molecular, L.P., et al v. Amer Intl Spclt Li, (5th Cir. 2011)
... to pay for claims relating to “bodily injury which takes place while the person injured is on t...�bodily injury” while their workers compensation policy specifically provides coverage for “bodilly injury by accident” and “bodily injury by disease.” They maintain ...
- Federal Circuits
- Cartwright v. Conrad, (Ohio 2005)
Trial court did not err when it granted summary judgment for the employer on an employee’s claim for worker’s compensation benefits for an injury she received in an auto accident while traveling home from work, notwithstanding the fact that the driver of the vehicle in which she was riding was on an errand for their joint employer because the errand was merely incidental to the injured employee’s journey home and not a major factor in it. Judgment affirmed.
- Ohio Supreme Court
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430 (1943)
... of the United States, an award of compensation for personal injury under the Texas Workmen's Comp...Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission, 294 U.S. 532 , 55 S.Ct. 518; Pacific ...
- U.S. Supreme Court